I cannot imagine that Peter Jackson approached his mean-spirited editorial about Northwestern tours with an open mind. Jackson insinuates that the campus tours, which I supervise, mislead Northwestern's prospective students. As an employee and a recent alumnus, I find the contention insulting. The advantages of the university are many, and we strive to give the most honest account of these benefits possible.
Northwestern is a real place and, as such, has its share of issues. Any one of these, including several mentioned in the article, could have sustained a full editorial. Yet no visitor would expect the tour to dwell on these negatives, so why does Jackson?
Jackson indicates that we also mislead students when we stress the positives. This contention rests primarily on Jackson's personal opinion, with his own statistics thrown in for good measure. For example, Jackson asserts that rooms in Allison, Bobb and Elder are "at most two feet longer" than the room shown in CRC. This is not only incorrect - the typical Allison double is listed as three feet longer than the room in CRC - but also misleading. Three feet of extra length makes a huge difference in the square footage of a room. In fact, a representative room in CRC is only about 80% of the size of the typical Allison double. Not to mention that dwelling on these statistics overlooks the bigger picture of the college experience. The size of your room matters far less than who you share it with.
Elsewhere, Jackson criticizes our tour guide for mentioning that PETA selected Northwestern as the top campus in the U.S. for vegans and vegetarians on the grounds that the pick "befuddles" him. High school students visiting our office are often concerned about living on their own for the first time, and seek reassurances that their preferences will be accounted for. While I appreciate Jackson's opinion, I can hardly fault our tour guides for trusting PETA on this point.
I chose these examples not because they are the only flaws in Jackson's piece, but simply because they are the best indicator of an editorial that was, on the whole, scattershot and poorly reasoned.
2008 Woodie Awards
The DAILY encourages you to share your thoughts on this story. Please help us keep the discussion lively, but civil. Comments that are abusive to others, off-topic or vulgar, or comments that misrepresent someone's identity, will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete any comments in violation or to close comment threads on articles.
Please e-mail online@dailynorthwestern.com to flag a comment or for more information.
Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 1
LV
posted 7/21/08 @ 12:26 AM CST
I could not agree more. I think that Josiah has eloquently summarized all of the grievances and reactions of many Daily readers (documented in the comments to Jackson's article). (Continued…)
Post a Comment