As acceptance of interracial marriage rises in the United States, an increasing number of mixed-race couples are tying the knot, according to a report released Thursday by the Pew Research Center.
The report, titled "The Rise of Intermarriage," was compiled after the Washington, D.C.-based think tank conducted several nationwide telephone surveys in late 2009.
"About 15 percent of all new marriages in the United States in 2010 were between spouses of a different race or ethnicity from one another, more than double the share in 1980 (6.7 percent)," according to the report.
More than four in 10 people also said intermarriage has been a change for the better in American society. Among 18-to-29-year-olds, that number was six in 10, a statistic that may be reflected among interracial couples at Northwestern.
Weinberg junior Pauline Park first started dating fellow Weinberg junior Weston Grimes in high school. Park is Korean-American and Grimes is white.
Park said although her friends accepted her interracial relationship, her parents were initially hesitant.
"I think coming from a minority, they were hoping that I would find someone that understands their culture," Park said.
She said she hasn't noticed a dramatic difference in her life while dating someone of another race.
"I've always been in both the Korean-American community and the larger community," Park said. "It would make a difference for some people because they would have to get used a whole new dynamic of people."
Weinberg junior Kyle Trimble, who is white, said he never met an Arab person before meeting his girlfriend, Daily staffer Sarah Daoud.
Trimble said he values the cultural differences between himself and Daoud, who is of Lebanese and Palestinian descent.
"Sarah is really accepting of other people's lifestyleand for me, I'm just extremely interested in learning about her family and her culture and history," Trimble said.
Trimble added that he has encountered some disapproval from members of the community.
"Sometimes we're walking somewhere and Sarah will get a sharp look or shake of the head, but there has never been anything verbal," Trimble said. "But I can't think of anybody my age in a interracial relationship that has had an issue that they've brought it to me."
Reuel Rogers, a professor of political science at NU, said research suggests growing support for interracial marriage and provides evidence that American attitudes on race have liberalized over time.
"The younger generation is certainly more open-minded about interracial marriages," Rogers said.
But Rogers added that the rise in the numbers of interracial marriage is not a solid indicator of racial progress and improvement in racial attitude.
"I think there is far too much emphasis on it because the numbers are relatively small," Rogers said. "There are more pressing issues that have to deal with racial inequality that I would rather see greater focus on. This is one indication, but it would be a mistake to take this as a sign as overall racial progress in the country, because if we look at other indicators that have more meaning for the larger swab of minority populations in this country, we can see that there are still glaring racial disparities and inequalities that we need to attend to."
McCormick freshman Jesse Zhang said although he is accepting of interracial relationships, he wouldn't want to be in one himself.
"I just believe that marrying in your own race preserves cultural identity," Zhang said. "A lot is based off of family and social customs is something that is more desirable. I would prefer to marry an Asian."
But Zhang is part of the shrinking crowd of Americans not open to choosing intermarriage — 63 percent of people surveyed said it "would be fine" if a member of their family was involved in an interracial relationship, according to the Pew study. Additionally, 35 percent of Americans say an immediate family member or close relative is currently married to someone of a different race.
As tolerance of intermarriage spreads across the country, Ald. Delores Holmes (5th) said Evanston has long been an open-minding community.
"Evanston has been a voluntary, desegregated community for years," Holmes said. "When I was the director at Family Focus in 1976, there were interracial couples then. I think people choose who they want, and I think Evanston is very accepting of that, of whoever you love, whether it's a same-sex couple or interracial couple."
Weinberg senior Naveed Heydari, who is of Persian and Ecuadorian descent, said he was attracted to his white girlfriend particularly because she is of a different race.
"I think you always look for something new that you aren't used to," Heydari said. "Growing up, going to parties of Persians, I would see a lot of Persian girls. Seeing something new made it unique to me."
He said his parents are generally accepting of his relationship, focusing more about family morals than issues of race.
Weinberg junior Anthony Iglesias, who is Latino, said his parents have also been accepting of his relationships with people of dissimilar family backgrounds from his own.
"Every relationship that I've been in, my girlfriend's background, in terms of wealth, has always been way higher than my family's class background," Iglesias said. "My parents are always very satisfied and they understand that the people that I choose to be with are acceptable by their class and race."
Iglesias also said misconceptions exist about interracial relationships.
"A lot of people have asked me about subjects that … are based upon a lot of really rigid stereotypes, but none of my relationships have really focused on race," Iglesias said. "We do have a sense that there are some people who struggle with the idea of an interracial relationship."
Overall, Heydari said communities such as NU are quite accepting of interracial couples.
"It's the new norm," he said.
audreycheng2015@u.northwestern.edu

Yes. Desegregated, to abolish any law, provision, or practice requiring isolation of the members of a particular race in separate units. Having lived in Evanston for years I do agree that Evanston has been desegregated. No one is always treated well, which is horrible and unacceptable, but the ignorant actions of a few do not rightly reflect the opinions of everyone.Lastly, expressing varying opinions is essential, but when you don't do so maturely, you probably won't be shown all the respect you deserve. Therefore, if you just want to dismiss others, not elaborate on your opinions without sarcasm, and basically just be argumentative, as you have been, find a debate team to join.
I think you may be slightly misinterpreting what is being commented on. No one, besides you, has mentioned racism because I don't think that is what "Lost White Guy" is talking about. While his comment could have been better worded, I think he is simply pointing out part of something that you, quite sarcastically, just mentioned. Minorities should indeed be specific about their cultural origin because it allows them to express their individually unique cultures. What is being pointed out here, though, is that specifying cultural origin should not be afforded just to minorities, but equally to all individuals.For example, as "Lost American Guy" pointed out, just because you look like one ethnicity does not mean that you identify with that same culture (e.i. Asians can come from Europe and may not identify with Asian culture). In this case that person may prefer to be referred to as a mix of ethnic groups, like "Korean-American" in the article or, in the case of the European Asian, maybe "British-Chinese". Therefore, since we are all equals, everyone should be allowed to identify themselves beyond one word groups like "Asian", "Black", "White" ect. We all come from very diverse backgrounds regardless of how much melanin is in our skin.The point of this article was to draw attention to the growing numbers of interracial couples and a way of showing how diverse these couples are, is to contrast each person's cultural background. This contrast is very effective when one person's background is detailed, like "Korean-American", and the others is not quite as specific, "White". This also allows the article to be less wordy, but that doesn't mean that the other person shouldn't have the same opportunity to express their individual background.The original point about "find[ing] white people on this map", is that "white people" can come from a variety of places and ethnic backgrounds, just like everyone else. And while to some, it may seem mundane or even repetitive to detail the origin of someone that we can easily fit into a molds of "Asian", "Black", "White" ect. it is important that we don't. Everyone should celebrate their culture, whether considered a "minority" or not. Whether they identify themselves in cultures geographically close to one another, like a "Swiss-Irish", or geographically far from each other, like a "Korean-American". Each detail of someone makes a person who they are.
Anonymous, Some people in our society feel the need to label themselves with terms that make themselves feel unique, oppressed, and ultimately to receive different treatment that may even benefit their careers/lives, solely based on their skin color. To be scientifically correct everyone is of African decent based on where humans evolved/began. Ones skin color is not the definitive factor of where they are from (whites can be from Africa, blacks from Asia, Asians from Europe, etc.) nor is race a factor when considering their potential to contribute in our society when forming out-of-date social programs.
You said minorities identify with their origin more than white people, and "for good reason?!" Again, skin color is not the definitive factor when considering "origin" and for example, why would a black person want to be labeled as "African" when he or she has earned the right to be called American and has never even been to Africa or even know if they are really from Africa, but I guess a continent plagued with genocide and corruption is a more worthy origin.
Maybe if these people in The United States identified themselves as being American there would be less of an issue, because we would all be one strong nation with out dividing into social groups based on race.
Go Celebrate White History Month somewhere else. Your humor is lost on everyone who isn't you.