Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Head to head: Schapiro and Living Wage Campaign tackle the issues

Published: Thursday, February 25, 2010

Updated: Sunday, February 28, 2010 15:02

The Northwestern Living Wage Campaign drew more than 370 students to rally Wednesday in efforts to raise University employee wages to $13.23 an hour. Below, University President Morton Schapiro and NLWC Campaign Coordinator Matthew Fischler, a Weinberg senior, go issue by issue with The Daily.

The living wage for NU employees should be set at $13.23 an hour

Morton Schapiro Schapiro: To pick $13.23 is bad economics. I know they have economist that signed off on this, but I'm a labor economist. I've worked on these issues. I just don't think it makes logical sense. The federal minimum wage is $7.25. If you multiply that times 40 hours a week times 52 that comes out as 15,000 even. That's the federal minimum wage. Now there are states, many of them, and cities that say $7.25 is too low. $15,000 is below the poverty level depending on where you live, depending on your family structure, etc. The highest I've ever seen is Santa Fe, New Mexico. Their minimum wage is $10 an hour. So 10 times 40 times 52 is $20,500 … $13.23 is 27,500 … So $15,000 is too low so you go to $27,500. Well why don't we pick $15? Why not $17? … I can understand why people want to have a set number, but as an economist, it doesn't make a lot of sense.


Matthew Fischler Fischler: We're asking for a living wage, which is based on the Illinois Self Sufficiency Standard, which is calculated by the Heartland Alliance. The way this living wage is calculated is based on the average prices of normal goods in the Cook Country area like food, child care, transportation, etc. This wage is calculated specifically to meet the basic needs of any worker and their family. And it's really key to say "basic needs" because it's not a wage in which an individual can save money for retirement, to put their kid through Little League. It's literally the minimum amount a person can make so that they don't have to sacrifice any basic life necessities.


Subcontracted workers are not directly employed by the University

Morton SchapiroSchapiro: I've always felt that if they're in custodial or dining services, they're serving you, and they look like they work for us. It doesn't matter that they work for a contractor. So I've never found that a compelling argument. If I were a student, and I heard the president say, "Oh they don't work for us," I'd think that was a cop out … Someone in my position might say, "We have 5,000 employees. They're taken care of. Go away." I don't find that compelling because even though you're working for Sodexo or Aramark, they kind of look like they're working for us, and it's our subcontract. So I think that I agree with students who say we have to care about them as well.


Matthew Fischler Fischler: The heart of our campaign is that we want workers to be fully included in the Northwestern community … For contract employers, even though they're not employed by Northwestern, they work on our campus every day, and they interact with us every day. So we want them to be fully included in the community and have the same kinds of community benefits that Northwestern staff do, like library privileges, Northwestern shuttles, discounts at cultural and sporting events. And that's something we are working with the administration on, and we believe it's a first step in including these workers in our community.


A living wage for all employees would cost students

Morton Schapiro Schapiro: One of the arguments people make is that if we have to give raises, even if it's not people working directly for us … clearly we have to pass it all on to the students … Room and board are a revenue system. It's supposed to have a balance. It's supposed to break even. That's a reasonable argument, but if I were a student, I'd say, "Well maybe subvene it." There are certain things we do at the University that don't pay for themselves. Even if (room and board) are a revenue center, you allow them to be somewhat in the red. So again to give you good arguments, against me I suppose, if you subvene you say, "Where do you take it from?" But you know, simply if you're willing to pay a higher tuition, room and board, we can do it. But as an economist and as someone who cares about social justice, I don't find that compelling.


Matthew Fischler Fischler: I don't have the budget in front of me. But I think we can be creative in terms of the ways of the cost of this Living Wage Campaign are shared or even measure in other areas, whether it's some of the sustainability stuff we're doing on campus or in other areas. We'd have to talk more to know specifics. I think there is some leverage because the contract Northwestern has with Sodexo is profitable … Northwestern is kind of in a position to negotiate with Sodexo and say, "We do have your business, but if you want to keep our business, you're going to have to pay your workers these minimum standards." … We know it is possible to fund this without placing significant financial burden on students.


The next step for improving NU worker conditions

Morton Schapiro Schapiro: I just met with (Vice President for Business and Finance) Gene Sunshine, and we're talking about the things we can do. Maybe we can give really good subsidized parking and have all our staff have free passes. Maybe we can do a range of different benefits. That's our moral responsibility. But I don't really believe the simplicity of $13.23, and there's good and there's evil. The world should be so simple. As someone who has devoted his life to social justice, it bothers me a little to get some nasty e-mails about if I cared about the world from a 20-year-old who's never done anything besides protest outside my window … If it were so easy, I would do it in a second.


Matthew Fischler Fischler: The reason we are doing this is because we want to hold (Schapiro) accountable to his words … We're trying to create this kind of community, and then we're also trying to uphold him to the rhetoric and the vision he has for this University, too. I don't want him to think we think he's this immoral person who doesn't understand the economic justice or the moral value of this. I think he does … But I think that he should sit back and recognize we are not doing this to either antagonize him or because were naive. We're trying to work and create the kind of community that we both want at this University.


ksalyer@u.northwestern.edu

Photos by Chris Kirk

University President Morton Schapiro and Living Wage Campaign coordinator Matthew Fischler, a Weinberg senior, discuss a living wage.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

26 comments

Anonymous
Sat Dec 11 2010 14:33
This living wage campaign is little more than an attempt by pampered college students to pad their resumes and act like their important. If the living wage campaign was actually legitimate, the workers themselves would be starting and fueling it. And also, it's not even economically feasible. A Kellogg graduate did the numbers to prove it.

so to all of you stupid college Obama kids who are a part of this, stop acting cute and live in the real world.

In the Real World
Sun Mar 7 2010 12:57
Raising minimum wages is a sure-fire way to reduce the availability of jobs, especially non-essential ones. Not exactly the prescription we need to climb out of this recession...
West of Weden
Sun Mar 7 2010 12:51
Just a wild, crazy thought here: What if minimum-wage workers delay having children until they can afford them? Birth control options abound. If married, both can work their minimum-wage jobs and earn a combined $30,000 per year.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 2 2010 20:14
"work study money comes from the federal government. everything else aside, it would be impossible for students to fight for an increase in work study funding from the university. "

clearly you are not on the work-study program, or if you are, are unfamiliar with how the program works.
the federal government subsidizes work-study, but ultimately, it is up to employers to decide how much they want to pay students

Anonymous
Mon Mar 1 2010 18:02
work study money comes from the federal government. everything else aside, it would be impossible for students to fight for an increase in work study funding from the university. also, a big part of the living wages fight seems to be building community on campus. at least students are attempting to do something instead of being passive. they are in for a fight, but at least some one is making a move.
Anonymous
Mon Mar 1 2010 16:29
What bothers me about the living wage campaign is 1) it doesn't seem like the studentshave thought critically about (or even have, say, an intermediate-micro-theory-level understanding of) the economics of the situation, and 2) the students are using this stuff, present and future, to pad their law school, fellowship, etc., applications. For these reasons, particularly as an attack on Morty (a labor economist who has been committed to social justice outside the realm of resume padding), the campaign has some major problems.
Anonymous
Mon Mar 1 2010 06:06
Harvard (Continued)

"The Outcome

The Sit-In was followed by a year of negotiating with the administration. Ultimately, Harvard agreed to pay all its service workers, including janitors, security guards and dining workers, a living wage of $10.25 per hour in 2002. This represented a significant, immediate raise for over 1,000 service workers, some of whom had been earning as little as $8 per hour. Harvard also agreed to immediately place a moratorium on outsourcing jobs to lower-paying companies. In the end, the Campaign resulted in annual pay and benefits gains of more than $10 million per year for service workers on campus."

Anonymous
Mon Mar 1 2010 05:57
Harvard
"gregoryhalpern.com/harvard.html"
Anonymous
Mon Mar 1 2010 05:49
Strike
Anonymous
Sun Feb 28 2010 14:57
"Will the students fight for me to get a living wage for my work study? If not, I want to know why that is different."

i can tell you why. fighting for your work-study doesn't allow these kids to pad their resume and get some warm feelings about how, despite living in a little bubble paid for by their parents for the last 20 years, they too understand how hard life is out there and that they're nice little social activists who will fight for justice

let me put it this way: living wage people, why don't you put your money where your mouth is, and instead of putting the burden on the rest of us who 1. don't give a ___ and 2. sometimes aren't that well off ourselves, you can raise your own money out of your own pockets to give to these people who supposedly can't "live" with their current wages.

Anonymous
Sun Feb 28 2010 13:00
the money needs to come from somewhere. cut out something unnecessary like dillo day or the great room.
Anonymous
Sun Feb 28 2010 01:34
Am I the only one who thinks that he sounds a little... artificial?
Anonymous
Sat Feb 27 2010 21:52
Will the students fight for me to get a living wage for my work study? If not, I want to know why that is different.
Anonymous
Sat Feb 27 2010 15:41
i'd be nice to see some budgets:
-NU's budget
-$27,500 per year self sufficiency standard from Heartland Alliance
Anonymous
Sat Feb 27 2010 04:32
"it bothers me a little to get some nasty e-mails about if I cared about the world from a 20-year-old who’s never done anything besides protest outside my window"

Brilliant, loved this line.

I also love how the student activists are trying to say "we the students demand this!!!" and yet immediately back off and hem and haw when somebody mentions what it would cost the students to pay for it. Nothing is free, fluff-heads.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 13:50
Above all else, this article shows that the students supporting the living wage and President Schapiro are on the same page on the fact that Northwestern does have responsibility over the dining hall, janitorial and Norris workers. Some Administrators previously quoted in the Daily have implied that because the workers are sub-contracted Northwestern does not have responsibility for them and therefore can turn a blind eye. We should be thankful that we have a President who is willing to stand up and take responsibility for the workers.

I take Schapiro at his word when he says he's committed to social justice (I never doubted that), but as Fischler implied in the article, being committed to talking about s to community social justice issues and actually acting on social justice issues are two different things. In this case, providing workers accesresources does not in itself constitute a commitment to social justice. It's a start, but it's not enough. Being committed to social justice means you are committed to tangibly enhancing the quality of the lives of the workers, which ultimately is tied to an increase in their wages. A new parking policy is great, but the larger problem is that workers cannot afford to even buy a car, put gasoline in the tank in the first place. Being committed to social justice means paying workers a living wage, period.

At the symposium on Black face this year, Schapiro noted that "I want students to hold me accountable." If we are going to truly hold him accountable to his commitment to social justice then students must keep pushing until workers are paid a living wage.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 13:49
Above all else, this article shows that the students supporting the living wage and President Schapiro are on the same page on the fact that Northwestern does have responsibility over the dining hall, janitorial and Norris workers. Some Administrators previously quoted in the Daily have implied that because the workers are sub-contracted Northwestern does not have responsibility for them and therefore can turn a blind eye. We should be thankful that we have a President who is willing to stand up and take responsibility for the workers.

I take Schapiro at his word when he says he's committed to social justice (I never doubted that), but as Fischler implied in the article, being committed to talking about s to community social justice issues and actually acting on social justice issues are two different things. In this case, providing workers accesresources does not in itself constitute a commitment to social justice. It's a start, but it's not enough. Being committed to social justice means you are committed to tangibly enhancing the quality of the lives of the workers, which ultimately is tied to an increase in their wages. A new parking policy is great, but the larger problem is that workers cannot afford to even buy a car, put gasoline in the tank in the first place. Being committed to social justice means paying workers a living wage, period.

At the symposium on Black face this year, Schapiro noted that "I want students to hold me accountable." If we are going to truly hold him accountable to his commitment to social justice then students must keep pushing until workers are paid a living wage.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 13:47
Above all else, this article shows that the students supporting the living wage and President Schapiro are on the same page on the fact that Northwestern does have responsibility over the dining hall, janitorial and Norris workers. Some Administrators previously quoted in the Daily have implied that because the workers are sub-contracted Northwestern does not have responsibility for them and therefore can turn a blind eye. We should be thankful that we have a President who is willing to stand up and take responsibility for the workers.

I take Schapiro at his word when he says he's committed to social justice (I never doubted that), but as Fischler implied in the article, being committed to talking about s to community social justice issues and actually acting on social justice issues are two different things. In this case, providing workers accesresources does not in itself constitute a commitment to social justice. It's a start, but it's not enough. Being committed to social justice means you are committed to tangibly enhancing the quality of the lives of the workers, which ultimately is tied to an increase in their wages. A new parking policy is great, but the larger problem is that workers cannot afford to even buy a car, put gasoline in the tank in the first place. Being committed to social justice means paying workers a living wage, period.

At the symposium on Black face this year, Schapiro noted that "I want students to hold me accountable." If we are going to truly hold him accountable to his commitment to social justice then students must keep pushing until workers are paid a living wage.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 13:47
Above all else, this article shows that the students supporting the living wage and President Schapiro are on the same page on the fact that Northwestern does have responsibility over the dining hall, janitorial and Norris workers. Some Administrators previously quoted in the Daily have implied that because the workers are sub-contracted Northwestern does not have responsibility for them and therefore can turn a blind eye. We should be thankful that we have a President who is willing to stand up and take responsibility for the workers.

I take Schapiro at his word when he says he's committed to social justice (I never doubted that), but as Fischler implied in the article, being committed to talking about s to community social justice issues and actually acting on social justice issues are two different things. In this case, providing workers accesresources does not in itself constitute a commitment to social justice. It's a start, but it's not enough. Being committed to social justice means you are committed to tangibly enhancing the quality of the lives of the workers, which ultimately is tied to an increase in their wages. A new parking policy is great, but the larger problem is that workers cannot afford to even buy a car, put gasoline in the tank in the first place. Being committed to social justice means paying workers a living wage, period.

At the symposium on Black face this year, Schapiro noted that "I want students to hold me accountable." If we are going to truly hold him accountable to his commitment to social justice then students must keep pushing until workers are paid a living wage.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 13:36
Students--our tuition goes up by a couple thousand dollars every year regardless of social justice policies. Is that money reinvested in our community? I would say no, since the only things I've seen actually get done in my four years here are that ugly arrangement in the ugly open space by the library (waste), the ugly renovation of the Tech entrance (total waste), the water facility by Norris (handles waste?) and the Great Room (never been there). Any of these kinds of worthless projects on the docket in the near future? You can start by canning those.






log out