Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Mahen: Ditching dirty word taboos

Published: Sunday, October 18, 2009

Updated: Monday, October 19, 2009 00:10

I'll never forget my middle school health class. On the first day, my teacher asked us to say certain words out loud and laugh as much as we wanted to to "get it out of our system."She said the first word. "Penis." The class erupted in laughter. Second word, "vagina." More laughter. Finally, "sex." There was a ripple of giggles.

It's amazing to me that now, we're in our twenties and sex is still taboo. Deny it if you'd like, but if it wasn't taboo, I wouldn't have this column, girls wouldn't spend two hours getting ready to go to a bar and guys wouldn't have to use lines like, "Wanna come over and see my puppy?"

It's the elephant in the room at every bar, party, date and other social setting. We can't help it. It's human nature. According to the Kinsey Reports, 54 percent of men think about sex every day or several times a day. (Note: the Kinsey Reports were conducted through self-reports). A more recent study conducted by neuropsychiatrist Dr. Louann Brizendine found that men think about sex every 52 seconds and women typically think of it once a day. Bottom line: We think about sex. A lot.

So, if we're constantly thinking about it then why is sex still so controversial? We've certainly come a long way from the days of Freud, and there is enough literature and stimuli in everyday life that brings the subject of sex out in the open. But, for some reason whenever it comes up in a social situation, we avoid it like South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford avoids the subject of his fidelity.

Wouldn't it be nice to live in a society like Margaret Meade painted in her book, "Coming of Age in Samoa?" A society that was free from sexual tension and sexual restraints all because everyone was DTF. Well, it would certainly make Keg and Deuce nights less interesting. To quote the great Will Ferrell, "It'd be like fishing with dynamite."

So, Meade's sexual utopia probably isn't the answer. It would suck all the fun out of those rambunctious nights on the town. "The chase" would cease to exist and we'd probably live in a disease ridden, overpopulated society. But instead of losing all our morals and values, what if we simply accept the taboo instead of hiding it under the rug? I think Salt-N-Pepa had it right when they sang, "Let's talk about sex, baby…"

We have to stop throwing our arms in the air and posting a scarlet ‘A' on anyone who broaches the subject. Van Wilder said it best, "Don't take life to seriously. You'll never get out alive." The more we talk about sex, the more immune we'll be and then maybe, just maybe, we can have a little fun with the subject and embrace it for what it is — a good time, a bad decision or simply the path to reproduction.

 

j-mahen@northwestern.edu

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

13 comments

10 in. *soft*
Mon Oct 19 2009 17:17
yo i got that dtf too. i bring the dizzle on u more den deez foos all up in ur grill bout gramerr n dat. hit me up pretty whizzite lady.

i pack a meaty chud.

O.G. Nicky Hayes
Mon Oct 19 2009 17:13
I love you, Jill. Your column makes me feel "DTF." I'm in Dallas, TX. Ill fly you down here and ride you like a rodeo clown. red nose and all.

p.s. bring your clown shoes :)

Your name
Mon Oct 19 2009 17:06
"Don't take life to seriously..." - really? You can't even avoid simple grammatical errors?
Jeff Jordan
Mon Oct 19 2009 17:04
Ms. Mahen,

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this site is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

your name
Mon Oct 19 2009 16:15
i find your columns to be amateur and overdone. They lack creativity, any level of insight, and general writing talent.

I agree with the criticism that you have received, and urge you to make a better effort when you hold such a public column spot.

"some people are so sad." argues that you shouldn't be receiving any negative feedback but it goes without saying that any writer that shuns criticism is bound to go nowhere.

you forgot to quote george michael: i want your sex.
Mon Oct 19 2009 15:36
did you write this in 15 minutes during class? girl, you better start taking more pride in your work. i've read the past three columns, and so far i've just seen you perpetuate stereotypes like it's cute. but it really isn't.
LAG
Mon Oct 19 2009 14:56
While i'm not suggesting this article is anyway groundbreaking, i don't think it deserves as much criticism, as it has gotten. While the author didn't explicitly comment on the legitimacy of Mead's research, she didn't suggest that it was accurate to real life either. She simply discussed the society that mead painted. Describing Mead's depictions as utopian (which they were), i think is a dead giveaway that they aren't realistic, i for one at least would not believe any description that suggested any society was utopian. (slash for the commentator criticizing the spelling of Mead's name, you might want to check your own spelling before throwing stones at others. Also Sanford probably doesn't want to discuss his fidelity or lack there of, just as much as he doesn't want to discuss his infidelity. While the words are opposites, they are the same subject. Just as the Detroit Lions might not want to discuss their wins in the past 2 years, or lack there of.

I think the main point here was that if people are going to tiptoeing around sex, using code words and euphemisms, wouldn't it be a little more adult to just come out and say what you want. But even if a guy and girl are both interested in having a one night stand, neither one of them is comfortable coming out and saying it, they need to pretend that something else is going on. (obviously there are many exceptions to this idea, and many people who have no problems being open about their sexuality.)

some people are so sad.
Mon Oct 19 2009 14:32
Jill- I loved your column this week. It was fresh, well written, and definitely made me laugh. Don't let the negativeness get to you.

As for your other comments, i just have one question- do you have a life? Do you have nothing better to do than sit on the daily's website, hitting refresh over and over again until Jill's column pops up and you can start googling her points to try to find things to make fun of her for? Jill is writing for her own enjoyment, with the hopes that other people will enjoy her writing too. If you don't, then here's a thought: instead of putting her down to make yourself feel intellectually superior, just don't read it.

Your name
Mon Oct 19 2009 14:31
sooooooooooooooooo funny! love it.
Your name
Mon Oct 19 2009 14:30
haha, I loved this one!! I'm studying in Europe this quarter so i'm excited I can still get caught up on the daily online! This topic is great because I totally agree and it's so much nicer in Europe because people are so much more open about sex: talking about it, doing it, and at the same time havign fun.

can't wait to see what's in store next week!

Your name
Mon Oct 19 2009 14:04
Quoting Maragaret Mead (whose name you can't even spell correctly)? You might at least state that her work has been heavily criticized, although in turn her critics have been attacked. Did your anthro professor even talk about Freeman's books, much less make you read them?

The KInsey work has been ripped, too, on statistical bias grounds among others. Are you aware of that? If so, why didn't you bother to tell your readers? If not, why not? Did your anthro professor mention these problems?

There's an old cigarette ad line directed toward women: "You've come a long way, baby.". For you, Ms. Mahen, as a journalist you have a long way to go.

Fact Check?
Mon Oct 19 2009 13:57
You mean Senator Sanford's "infidelity," not "fidelity." Those two words are opposites.

Also, Margaret Meade's book is one of the most notorious examples of wildly inaccurate results based on poor methodology. The society was not "DTF" but very Christian. You would know this if you took the time to google it.

The reasons some people choose not to broadcast or publish their one-night stands or other sexual activities is because they have class, not because it's taboo.

Your name
Mon Oct 19 2009 01:06
LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!! best one yet






log out