Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Letter to the Editor: Protesters seek to clarify Hoffman walkout

Published: Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Updated: Thursday, November 17, 2011 03:11

On Nov. 10, Northwestern students joined individuals from across Chicagoland to attend a lecture by Gil Hoffman, chief political correspondent for the Jerusalem Post. About half an hour into the event, roughly 30 students walked out. In response to misinformation as to what transpired and what motivated the participants, we provide clarification.

Prior to the event, students were well-informed of Hoffman's work and felt affording him a platform to speak was a disservice to the university. More specifically, it was Hoffman's conflict of interest, serving as both a high-profile journalist and reservist for the Israel Defense Forces, and his biased assertions that struck students as unacceptable.

Hoffman consistently minimizes Israel's misdeeds in the region, such as construction of illegal settlements on Palestinian land. He reprimands President Barack Obama for using settlements as a negotiating tool and claims they do not impede the peace process. Furthermore, he has made Islamophobic comments by tying the legitimate Palestinian struggle for rights to violent Islamic fundamentalism.

During the lecture, Hoffman's comments regarding the Israeli-Palestinian prisoner exchange prompted the walkout. Hoffman asserted that Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit was welcomed back to Israel with a regal reception while hundreds of Palestinian prisoners were greeted with guns and raging crowds calling for more Israeli captives. In reality, Palestinian prisoners received the same joyous welcome as Shalit after decades of imprisonment. Furthermore, Hoffman contrasted the brutal captivity of Shalit with the exceptional treatment of Palestinian prisoners, conveniently failing to mention overwhelming evidence of torture in Israeli prisons as presented by human rights groups.

Without impeding Hoffman's speech, the students expressed their discontent with both the speaker and his assertions by silently leaving. While the majority left, some stayed until the end of the presentation to question Hoffman. Audience members submitted questions to event organizers, who forwarded them to Hoffman. Two-thirds of the questions submitted went unanswered, despite the fact the audience witnessed Hoffman read those questions, mumble them into the microphone, and then place them aside, claiming that there were no further questions for him to entertain.

The objective of the walkout was to protest the disrespect to NU created by hosting a narrow-minded speaker who claims to be unbiased and clearly violates that ideal. Despite Hoffman's poor track record, protesters displayed the courtesy to participate in dialogue as some students stayed for the entire duration of the event.

   As a student group whose primary objective is to raise awareness of the Palestinian struggle, we encourage debate and seek active discussion across campus regarding the condition of the Palestinians. Surely, this walkout is only the starting point of many debates to come.

Ala Salameh, Colette Ghunim, Cory Behroozi, Natasha Singh, Nouha Boundaoui, Salma Salah, Sara Fadlalla, Soad Mana

Members of Students for Justice in Palestine

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

Anonymous
Thu Nov 17 2011 21:02
In response to Anonymous 3- did you fail to notice the part where some protesters stayed to ask questions? Or where they explained that it was the speaker's inaccurate and biased reporting that was cause of their distaste (not the fact that he was Israeli)? Or that it was his provocative remarks that prompted the walk-out?

Earlier this quarter member of Knesset Shlomo Molo spoke on campus and there was no such walk-out. Just because people support and empathize with the Palestinian struggle it does not mean they hate Israelis or do not want to hear their opinions.

If anything, by posting comments like the one you did perpetuates the inaccurate stereotypes that lead to the hate you speak of.

Anonymous
Thu Nov 17 2011 19:34
It is only the ignorant who walk out instead of paying the courtesy to listen and then question. Had the speaker been a Palestinian...who blasted Israel....of course they would have stayed. I am quite sure that their plan was to walk out irrespective of what was said. he was an Israeli after all...and therefore the cause of all their anger. Arab nations have always been sensitive and taken good care of the Palestinians in their midst.....in poverty riddled camps. While Jews who were thrown out of Arab lands and went to Israel were always absorbed and given full help and support to establish meaningful lives. This is why it's so hard to communicate with people so committed to hate.
Anonymous
Thu Nov 17 2011 15:29
I'm not a student at NU, but have been following the aftermath of Gill Hoffman's lecture. I was surprised to see how the majority of the NU campus looked at the protesters with discontent and criticized their actions. Many accused these students of not directly talking to Hoffman and accomplishing nothing. However, these students did in fact communicate and prove their point to Hoffman. Walking out is a statement in itself. However, some students did stay back to talk to Hoffman, and Hoffman did not even answer their questions. On top of that, this event was highly monitored and student action was restricted greatly. It was baffling to me that such a prestigious institution like NU would invite such a narrowed minded speaker. Regardless of political stance, extremism should be avoided by any university.
Anonymous
Thu Nov 17 2011 11:21
Thank you for giving a straightforward recap of the event!






log out