Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Fein: From Alaskan princess to Astroturf queen

Published: Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 02:02

Look out world, Sarah Palin is back.

Bored of hunting wolves from helicopters, making sure Russia isn't up to anything from her perch in Wasilla and hanging out with "first dude" Todd Palin, the pitbull in lipstick has returned. 

In an interview on "Fox News Sunday" this week, Palin said she would run for president "if I believed that that is the right thing to do for our country and for the Palin family."

As the keynote speaker at the National Tea Party Convention on Feb. 6, Palin sounded all the right notes (even if she read them off her hand), lecturing President Barack Obama to "stop lecturing and start listening." 

If Palin were to run for president, she would undoubtedly receive significant support from the Tea Party movement, which gave her $100,000 to address the convention. The Tea Party Patriots are dedicated to "grassroots organization powered by activism and civic responsibility at a local level," according to their Web site.

That's all well and good. Grassroots movements are an important part of our democracy, no matter which side they are on. However, to understand the Tea Party movement, we must identify the "real people" organizing at the grassroots to promote their conservative philosophy.

The Tea Party movement seemed to be a genuinely populist uprising against Obama and Democrats, but it was in fact the brainchild of two Washington-based conservative think tanks, Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks.

These organizations developed strategies to "make the demonstrations look homegrown," according to Newsweek. This method of orchestrating public outcry was deemed "Astroturf" activism by Sen. Lloyd Bentsen in 1985.

In a leaked memo titled "Rocking the Town Halls—Best Practices," FreedomWorks detailed its strategy of intimidating members of Congress. The memo directs "Patriots" to "artificially inflate your numbers," "be disruptive early and often" and "try to rattle (the Congressman), not have an intelligent debate."

Conservatives cry hypocrisy at allegations the Tea Party movement represents Astroturf activism, stating Organizing for America, the successor to the Obama campaign, is manufacturing public sentiment in favor of health care reform.

The key difference, however, is the Obama campaign was built on the backs of small donors: In January of 2008, 90 percent of Obama's supporters gave $100 or less, and about 40 percent gave $25 or less, according to Politico.com. The Tea Party movement, which collects its cash from conservative foundations, can make no such claim.

If Sarah Palin is a favorite of the Tea Party movement, and the Tea Party movement isn't really run by "real Americans," as its leaders would have us believe, then Palin in fact primarily represents conservative foundations funded by wealthy families and their corporate interests.

All hail the Queen of Astroturf activism.

Weinberg junior Jordan Fein can be reached at jordanfein2007@u.northwestern.edu.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

Anonymous
Thu Feb 11 2010 00:59
You don't need to look past the purple t-shirts to see who has heavy money on their side. Republicans, for instance, have proudly revealed for years that their average donation amounts to about $50. Democrats refuse to reveal their average donation. Something tells me it's maybe a little more than fifty bucks. I wonder how much George Soros gave last week.

The real juice comes not from this article, but from the video posted up above. There, Fein says that "Sarah Palin is almost like a new version of President Bush." Right. Except for the part where George Bush almost destroyed domestic policy in a push for big government and amnesty.

Then, he calls Palin "stupid" about seventeen different times. You've got to attack their ideas not their intelligence. You've got to attack their ideas not bring up thinly sourced accusations of big corporate backings.

Tell us why those evil right-wingers are so evil! When everyone wonders "What is he not telling us?" after every column, you're not doing it right. Compete in the market of ideas.

Anonymous
Wed Feb 10 2010 21:13
so if you disagree with the movement you have to question the motivation and lambast it as disingenuous?

jordan, your columns are so consistently ad hominem, half-truthed, and over the top, that they are no longer worth reading past the title...if for no other reason, because they are completely predictable

Anonymous
Wed Feb 10 2010 15:08
Wow. This commentary is disconnected from reality, but it's the typical Democrat playbook - accuse others of your own detrimental behavior. I guess Dems have forgotten their earlier whine "He who smelt it dealt it!"

There's no sense in making an argument to true-believers like this. They just don't get it. Until they get out in the real world, that is.

Anonymous
Wed Feb 10 2010 13:42
Coming? Face meet palm. Well, actually it is a wealthy elitist conspiracy that has already got us. Witness their long sought victory in the Supreme Court to allow even more spending by wealthy corporations to infulence laws and regulations in their favor. I notice that the phrase "Real Americans" has been driven into the mind set, even Boeing has a real american web site, attempting to correlate spending $35billion on tankers is a Real American thing to do. Despite the fact that the air force is shifting to drones.
Anonymous
Wed Feb 10 2010 03:21
Oh no! The vast right wing conspiracy is coming to get us all again! Terror!






log out